Should households pay for waste disposal?

In many civilized countries households pay a fee for funding the public waste disposal service. This system, however, stems from the age when garbage was dumped at landfills and waste was considered as a valueless annoyance. Though many developed countries has switched to incineration as their primary method of waste disposal, waste was and is still seen as the useless by-product of consumption.

Within that paradigm it makes sense to let people pay for the disposal of their own garbage, under the principle of “the polluter must pay”. This principle would be useful for the reduction of waste, if the waste disposal fee one has to pay, would depend upon the amount of waste one produces. However, in some countries this fee is either fixed or does dependent on the number of household member, rather than on the amount of waste produced.

Under a fixed fee there’s a perverse incentive for people to produce a great amount of waste. After all your waste disposal becomes cheaper if you have more waste to dispose. And the cost of your waste disposal will be shifted to those who produce less waste. It’s not hard to see how this would lead to a vicious circle to more and more waste.

The question is then why governments does choose for a fixed fee? The answer is simplicity. It’s difficult for tax authorities to make an accurate estimation of how much waste someone actually produces. Levying a fixed fee, or making it dependent upon the number of household members, is much easier for the government.

But we do not want to have landfills in space settlements, and due to the abundance of solar power in space waste incineration does not make much sense either. Therefore we should consider whether this linear paradigm is actually the correct frame to look at waste. As have argued in a previous post, recycling should be the corner-stone of the waste management system of space settlements.

With recycling garbage should not considered as valueless waste, as one’s garbage is another’s resource. Consequently waste processing is not longer a service which prime focus is managing of a public annoyance, but rather a productive and value adding industry. The revenue generated through the sale of the products of recycling plants, should be used to fund the waste management system of space settlements, rather than charging households for the disposal of their waste.


14 thoughts on “Should households pay for waste disposal?”

    1. Well, as I have understood it takes less energy to throw things out of our Solar System, than into the Sun. But in regard of unrecyclables, I have a better proposals.

      We can use them to make mini-black-holes, which will subsequently evaporate due to Hawking-radiation. This will effectively turn their mass into energy, according to Einstein’s equation E=MC².

              1. I’ve always liked Arthur C Clarke’s Rama series for plot. The arrival of an alien ship in our solar system is a great avenue to explore the human condition while letting the hard science fiction bind it together like scaffolding.

                I did a post where I dealt with this theme. You want to read it?

  1. What about 3D printing? Seems with lots of solar energy to harness, one could break down waste material to recycle using a 3D printer. Learned recently of something named the recyclables plastic project, which creates new 3D objects from torn apart plastic waste.

    One great thing about this post is learning new things or getting new ideas. Thank you.

First comment? Please read our comment policy first

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s