It has been done: the first baby has been born after a womb transplant. Swedish doctors have transplanted a womb into a 36-year-old woman who subsequently got pregnant and give birth to a son. Though being born prematurely, he is healthy. You could read more in The Guardian.
TheBadAstronomer explains what Lagrange points are, and why these are of interest for space exploration in the video below.
Below another, more technical video but very worth viewing.
On CBS we found the fascinating story of the accidental discovery of a bizarre mammal, which looks like a mouse with a proboscis and fits in the palm of your hand, but is actually related to elephants.
Though this question seems to be trivial, but in fact it is not. And if we want to introduce animal welfare legislation, we need to establish what organisms are animals.
In modern taxonomy animals (Animalia) are known as Metazoa. Animals are multicellular eukaryotes (i.e. animal cells have a nucleus), are heterotrophic (i.e. they don’t do photosynthesis, and chemical energy in the form of organic molecules to survive), and their cells don’t have a rigid cell walls (unlike plants, fungi and bacteria).
Taxonomists have divided the animal kingdom in three main groups: Eumetazoa, Mesozoa and Parazoa. The last subkingdom consists of multicellular animals who (unlike other animals) do not have tissues or organs. Currently only sponges belong to the Parazoans. The second group, Mesozoa, contains only worm-like parasites, and its actual status is subject of scientific dispute.
The first subkingdom, Eumetazoa, is by far the most interesting one, since it contains all other animals. Eumetazoans are animals with differentiated tissues and organs. Most aminals of this group of a symmetric body to a certain degree. Since only Eumetazoans are known to have nerve systems, and hence capable of suffering, it might be an idea to restrict animal welfare legislation to Eumetazoans rather to all Metazoans.
Many people have learned at school that life is divided into four kingdoms: bacteria, fungi, plants and animals. Only this system is now outdated due to new scientific (genetic!) research. There are two superkingdoms: Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes. The former is divided into Bacteria and Archaea. The latter is divided into: Unikonta and Bikonta. The latter contains plants, algae and similar organisms. Unikonta contains amoebozoa and opisthokonts.
Opisthokonts are further divided into main groups: Holomycota (includes among others fungi) and Halozoa. The latter group is then further divided into Mesomycetoea and Filozoa. Filozoans are divided into Filasterea, Choanoflagellata and Animalia. Choanoflagellata are a group of unicellular organisms, and they are the closest relatives of animals (most recent common ancestor living about 600 million years ago).
Scientists have discovered that, at least in mice, oxytocin plays a crucial role in muscle maintenance and that the amount of oxytocin decreases with age. Older mice have less of this hormone, and hence it takes more time for them to repair their muscles. By giving older mice a daily injection of oxytocin, their muscle repair capability was strongly improved.
Though this function of oxytocin has not been demonstrated in humans, oxytocin has been approved for clinical use in humans. If these results also apply to humans, it will be useful for elderly people who will be able to live healthier at higher age.
But since oxytocin improves muscle repair capability, there is a possibility that sportsmen will use it as doping. Since sportsmen use their muscles in a very intense manner, their muscles have a higher risk at damages. This is especially problematic during multi-day sport events as the Tour de France or the Fifa World Championship. The faster a sportsman can have his muscles repaired, the better his overall performance will be.
At this moment oxytocin is legal, and could be obtained and used easily, even if the effects on human muscles is unclear. And as long oxytocin is not listed as doping and sportsmen are not tested at this hormone, which also occurs naturally in our body (to make stuff even more difficult); sportsmen will be tempted to use oxytocin.
We have discussed in vitro meat several times at this site, mainly as an animal-friendly and suitable supply of meat for space settlers. The idea of in vitro meat is simple: take some muscle cells from an animal and put that in lab culture.
Andras Forgacs has realized that you do the same thing with skin tissue, and hence culture leather in the lab without killing animals. In the video below, Forgacs explains that cultured leather has not only the same qualities as “natural” leather, but actually one would create leather of superior quality. This because one has more control on conditions in which the leather is grown.
Leather has a certain appeal, and though I don’t buy leather for ethical reasons, I like this material. So do many vegetarians and vegans, so they do much efforts to obtain accurate imitation leather (if I need to buy new shoes, I have to take a one-hour train trip to Amsterdam to buy shoes at a special vegan shoe shop).
Cultured leather would be great for those who like both animals and leather products. Further it would prevent the slightly dystopian future I described in this story I wrote two years ago about a world were cattle farming has been out phased to make room for growing energy crops.
The first two videos are uploaded by CentripetalWorlds. Both feature O’Neill cylinders, video one appears to show, the construction of an O’Neill cylinder.
Two rotating O’Neill cylinders (warning: annoying sound, please mute volume).
A different but related design, the Kalpana One:
The Kalpana One is an interesting design, and quite suitable for the first generation of space settlements (O’Neill cylinders have been considered as a second generation space habitat since they were designed).
For a technical discussion of O’Neill cylinders, by no one less than O’Neill himself, see here.
Earlier we discussed the problems associated with prostitution (e.g. human traffic among others) on this site. We also proposed a system to solve some of these problems. In this post another “solution”: robot prostitutes.
In his book Love & Sex With Robots David Levy explores “the evolution of human-robot relationships”, more precisely romantic human-robot relationships. With having to summarize Levy’s book, he presents an argument why it is inevitable that people will have sex with robots, and that some people will even go so far as that they will “marry” their sex robot.
Not surprisingly Levy went on to discuss why people (men and women) visit prostitutes. He notes the similarity between paying a prostitute and either purchasing or renting [by the hour or the day] a sex robot.
For robot prostitution no significant technological breakthroughs are required, after all there are currently highly realistic sex dolls. Further animatronics is also well-developed, as is seen in these videos:
The main benefit of sex robots is that they cannot suffer, and hence they can be programmed to “like” being a prostitute. Therefore exploitation of [robot] sex workers will not be an issue. Maybe it will be an idea to ban human prostitution all together, and keep only robot prostitution legal.
Dutch scientists have succeeded in transmitting information through quantum teleportation, and thereby they proved that Einstein was wrong on this issue.
The essence of quantum teleportation is that information is transferred from A to B, without passing through the intermediate space be it through fibers or radio waves. And because the information does not traverse space, it cannot be intercepted, hence quantum teleportation would allow a totally secure connection. The only thing you need to set up a secure channel, is to create a pair of entangled particles.
Besides complete confidentiality, quantum teleportation has another advantage. Radio waves can interfere with each other, causing loss of date and fibers can be broken. Neither of this will happen with quantum teleportation. Also unlike with radio-communication a person using QT cannot be detected by a third party. This is interesting for military operations in space.
Two space settlements can securely communicate with each other if they have each one of half of an entangled pair. And by having multiple pairs, one could construct a secure communication network between several space settlements. But there is one big warning to be made: secured communication is only guaranteed between two parties, once a party has received the information it would be able to intercept the information at that point. So if you send information from A to C through B by QT, you still need to take measures to secure B.
Humans need water to survive, and hence a reliable water supply is essential for Space Settlements. Fortunately Near Earth Objects consist for a substantial part of water. However human and industrial consumption of water produces waste water. Though we could “dump” this into space and replace it with fresh water from NEOs, that would be quite inefficient, and it also limites the growth of Space Settlements in the long run. Consequently we need to recycle water in Space habitats.
Basically we need a closed loop in which waste water is turned back into drinkable water. Hence a reliable and preferably cheap method of water purification is essential for the successful humanization of space.
A potentially promising method seems to be found. According to this article in the Science Daily, graphene is an excellent water filter. Not only is this method fast, it is also not energy intensive, and scientists hope to be able to turn seawater into freshwater just by using a hand pump with this graphene filter in the near future.
Nowadays graphene can be produced easily, and it is an allotrope of carbon, an element very abundantly in Near Earth Asteroids.
On a side note, we could wonder whether graphene filters can be used for extracting uranium from seawater. Though the concentration of uranium in seawater is low, the total amount of uranium in the oceans far exceed to total known reserves on land. But due to the concentration of uranium in seawater many scientists believe, extraction from seawater will be impracticable, at least with current market prices.
According to the Science Daily article, graphene filters can accurately distinguish between difference in atomic seizes. This would be important if we want to filter out uranium atoms from seawater.
Probably we would need two filters: one the filter out atoms and molecules larger than uranium, and a second filter which on let smaller atoms and molecules through. Consequently the uranium atoms will get trapped between the two filters, and with each cycle the concentration of uranium will increase.
If this procedure will be feasible, then most countries will be able to become self-sufficient in their uranium supply. Currently only a few countries dominate the world market.